It was like any other day of the week towards the end of her quarter at school. My girlfriend,
We are all at some point bought in to believe that what we individually perceive is the reality of everyone else. This is alluded to in great detail by Plato’s Allegory of the Cave in which we see people chained up viewing images on a cave that are two to three times removed from their actual manifestations. Plato comments that this is how most of us live our lives everyday. While it may not be as extreme as what Plato describes there are many instances in which we are not experience reality in the world around us. Chief Sealth touched upon this many times during his sermon about the basic beliefs of his people:
“Our dead never forget the beautiful world that gave them being. They still love its winding rivers, its great mountains and its sequestered vales, and they ever yearn in tenderest affection over the lonely-hearted living, and often return to visit and comfort them” (5).
This idea of a reality that we cannot sense through our five senses is something that is not totally outside the realm of science these days. With the development of alternate dimension theories and the like, it is not hard to understand what men like Plato and Sealth were saying regarding transcendent realities.
Since we are unable to truly see reality as it is, that may mean the ideas and values we hold are nothing but relative to the perceptual relationship we have our own reality. Through observing, we can assume that the morals of the judge from the story are faulty in the sense that he causes suffering to the family, thus we infer at some point that perhaps what is not relative towards human beings is the idea of suffering. If it is anything that is universal for humans (and by extent other creatures) is that life is a struggle in some degree depending on the individual. Therefore, this would have to apply as a universal value system where we would not bring about any intentional or preventable suffering upon one another. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an activist and rhetorician from the mid-1900s who fought for the rights of his people in a time and place that had been source of great injustice. In his classic deductive style King says that a “just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” The “law of God” he refers to is that universal human law because it is something that transcends culture, race, religion, or ideology. It is the law outside of relativism regardless of who is in charge in the mundane reality of everyday life.
As a martial artist, I feel there is something that needs to be reconciled with when it comes to a non-violent attitude towards life. It has often been my conundrum in life to walk the path of a “peaceful warrior”: not willing to hurt someone but able to do so if the situation calls for it. I have often struggled with the idea, and as I develop further in both areas of my life I am often led to feel the need to reconcile the difference between the two. It is my opinion that Machiavelli provides the beginning of the answer to that very question. Niccolo Machiavelli had at one time been a statesman in the free
This relative philosophy is largely based on what works for the given situation. Machiavelli was largely influenced by what he found true at that moment, and when it did not work it was best to try something else. This means that it’s more importantly to look towards the end of one’s objective and whatever means may be used to get there. This is especially useful in combat, where if two combatants were fighting, and one had certain principles that prevented the use of certain tools than it would be figured that this combatant had a greater chance of losing in that situation. Since it is important in combat to have trained every part of oneself, the absolutism of Plato is useless to those that must defend oneself. Machiavelli felt that maintaining certain ‘good qualities’ all of the time would do more harm than good, however, “appearing to have them will benefit” one (69). This application of ‘good qualities’ will put those at ease but allow oneself to have certain moral relativism in order to live life without being always taken advantage of.
Therefore, what Machiavelli provides us is a framework in which to balance the two aspects of a “peaceful warrior.” Yet, it is not complete because to just say ‘I can do it when I need to’ may not always be the best medicine for the disease. Restraint is a necessity in life because that is where one can cause more problems in the end. There two other qualities that are necessary to have, and not just appear to have as Machiavelli had suggested; those qualities are wisdom and mindfulness. Without either of these qualities combined with restraint, the “peaceful warrior” finds himself in far more trouble than necessary and is not looking at the whole reality outside of his perceptions.
When we dwell on these aspects, it’s important to return to the story from the beginning about the judge and the young girl. Allowing ourselves to just assume a reality without the proper wisdom and mindfulness often sets up a house of cards where the structure is an illusion built on a faulty base. These blind assumptions then cause the suffering to others that violates the very “laws of God.”

